Integrity. Transparency. Accountability.

The EIRB decides whether a project should proceed and, if so, under what specific terms and conditions. In making its decision, the EIRB considers the need for wildlife conservation, mitigation, and remedial measures.

I am a

Member of the Public

I am a

Member of the Public

The Environmental Impact Review assesses project impacts using guidelines for criteria such as air and water quality. Transparent notifications keep the public informed through announcements and legal notices. Public involvement in meetings and comment periods ensures comprehensive evaluation and inclusive decision-making.

I am a

Affiliate/Partner

I am a

Affiliate/Partner

The Environmental Impact Review meticulously evaluates the impact of projects on the environment, adhering to established Review Guidelines as mandated in the IFA. Various stakeholders collaboratively shoulder responsibilities. Interested in engagement? Attend pertinent meetings and contribute during designated comment periods.

I am a

Government Agency

I am a

Government Agency

The Environmental Impact Review Process constitutes a comprehensive examination of project effects on the environment. The responsibility of Federal and Territorial Government Agencies is integral to this process. Their roles encompass regulatory oversight, coordination, and ensuring compliance with environmental standards. Collaboration between the public and government entities is essential for informed decision-making and sustainable environmental practices.

I am a

Developer/Proponent

I am a

Developer/Proponent

The Environmental Impact Review Process is a methodical assessment of a project’s environmental consequences. The review guidelines serve as a roadmap, guiding the evaluation with a focus on factors like air and water quality. Developers play a crucial role by providing project details and implementing mitigation measures. Initial contact involves gathering information and setting up transparent communication for ongoing collaboration.

Integrity. Transparency. Accountability.

The EIRB decides whether a project should proceed and, if so, under what specific terms and conditions. In making its decision, the EIRB considers the need for wildlife compensation, mitigation, and remedial measures.

Tuktoyaktuk, NT

Environmental Impact Review Process

The EIRB decides whether a project should proceed and, if so, under what specific terms and conditions. In making its decision, the EIRB considers the need for wildlife compensation, mitigation, and remedial measures.

Co-Management System

The Environmental Impact Review Board (EIRB) is an integral part of a Co-management System established pursuant to the Inuvialuit Final Agreement. The Co-management System in the Western Arctic and Yukon North Slope is composed of five Co-Management Boards.

Tapestry from Agnes Kuptana

Culture is our anchor and our compass, guiding us through life’s journey. As an Inuvialuit, it’s vital for us to honor our heritage, teach our younger generations, and nurture the environment that sustains us.

Catherine Cockney
EIRB Chair
Ulukhaktok, NT

Registry Updates


Latest News


Latest News
Imaryuk – Husky Lakes, NT